Decision Making of Condition Monitoring using AHP and TOPSIS Method
A. B. Gholap1, M. D. Jaybhaye2
1A. B. Gholap, Mechanical Engineering Department, Marathwada Mitra Mandals college of engineering, Pune, India.
2M. D. Jaybhaye, Department of Production Engineering and Industrial Management, College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Manuscript received on July 20, 2019. | Revised Manuscript received on August 10, 2019. | Manuscript published on August 30, 2019. | PP: 495-499 | Volume-8 Issue-6, August 2019. | Retrieval Number: E7911068519/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.E7911.088619
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: In today’s maintenance era various techniques are used for prevention of breakdown in mechanical engineering. Condition Monitoring Technique selection is a challenging job. MCDM can be useful in selecting between different methods. In this paper attempt is made to use GTMA and TOPSIS for comparing the various CM techniques. Attributes like Diagnostic Quality, Quantity of failure which can be measured, Cost, Supportability of diagnostic method and Environmental interference are used for current study. From the analysis is observed that ferrography and vibration analysis are the two most important techniques among various CM techniques.
Keywords: CBM, MCDM, GTMA, TOPSIS.