Is the Delayed Correction Coming Down in Tidying up the Language Knowledge of Engineering Graduates in the Substantial Classrooms?
M.D. Thamarai Selvi1, Ramesh Kumar2
1M.D.Thamarai Selvi. (PhD) Research Scholar, , Veltech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R & D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Dr. Ramesh Kumar, Assistant Professor of English, Veltech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R & D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Manuscript received on September 23, 2019. | Revised Manuscript received on October 15, 2019. | Manuscript published on October 30, 2019. | PP: 6810-6815 | Volume-9 Issue-1, October 2019 | Retrieval Number: A2981109119/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.A2981.109119
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: This analysis focuses on however editing and correction boil down to cleaning up the grammatical, mechanical and usage errors within the writings of engineering students. The matter known within the engineering students writing is that they need “knowledge problems” yet as “performance issues.” This downside is proved with the instance of huge class room. The classroom consists of sixty students is taken as sample. The teaching technique used here is delayed correction. Through this method and its analysis is proved that editing and error correction reduced in framing Ill formed sentences. The method used is that the classroom split into groups of five Students as Self -peer and teacher correction evolved during this activity.
Keywords: Knowledge issues” (errors) and “Performance issues” (mistakes). Self-correction, Peer-correction, Teacher-(delayed) correction.