Pasta based on Sweet Potato: Optimization of Fiber Content in Response Surface Methodolgy
Bazil Wilfred.C1, Elizabeth Amudhini Stephen.S2, Rebecca Jebaseeli Edna.K3, Kulastic Jassy4

1Bazil Wilfred .C, Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, India.
2S,Elizabeth Amudhini Stephen*, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, India.
3Rebecca Jebaseeli Edna.K, Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, India.
4Kulastic Jassy, Department of Food Processing, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore

Manuscript received on March 29, 2020. | Revised Manuscript received on April 25, 2020. | Manuscript published on April 30, 2020. | PP: 976-980 | Volume-9 Issue-4, April 2020. | Retrieval Number: C5316029320/2020©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.C5316.049420
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Abstract: Sweet potato as a high fibre supplement that can be used in the production of pasta. The production of sweet potato pasta was optimized by Response Surface Methodology. The parameters used for optimizing the products are solid loss, texture, fibre content. Box – behnken design was used to develop models for the response. For the production of sweet potato based pasta 174.285 g of sweet potato, 48.4735 g of water, 28.8296 g of soy flour, 2.69575 g of Arabic gum and 0.877038 g of cmc (carboxyl methyl cellulose). The responses were mostly deviated by changes in quantity of soy flour and Arabic gum and to a small extent the deviation by sweet potato and water levels. The result of this study showed a minimum solid loss of 13.45% and maximum texture hardness of 6994 g and maximum fibre content of 8.52 g.
Keywords: Sweet potato, soy flour, Arabic gum, carboxyl methyl cellulose, Response Surface Methodology, solid loss, texture hardness, fibre content.