Nonlinear Behavior of Building with Varying Percentages of Slab Opening
Syed Haneef Ali1, A Vimala2

1Syed Haneef Ali, Department of Civil Engineering, Anurag Group of Institutions, Venkatapur, Ghatkesar, Medchal, India.
2Dr. A. Vimala, Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Anurag Group of Institutions, Venkatapur, Ghatkesar, Medcha, India.
Manuscript received on September 26, 2019. | Revised Manuscript received on October 20, 2019. | Manuscript published on October 30, 2019. | PP: 190-193 | Volume-9 Issue-1, October 2019 | Retrieval Number: A1114109119/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.A1114.109119
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (

Abstract: The work describes about irregular plan geometric forms that are more in metro cities. Irregularities are not avoidable in construction of buildings. In present scenario many buildings have irregular configurations both in elevation and plan. Now a day’s openings in the floors are common for many reasons like stair cases, lighting architectural etc. The present study focuses on the behavior of 10 storey reinforced concrete buildings under seismic zone-v, the plan dimensions is taken as 28 m x 28 m. The plan irregularities such as openings in slab with varying percentages is taken in this study. Study is done on various plan configuration buildings and the action of structural diaphragm on its performance during earthquake is studied. Pushover analysis is performed by using ETABS software, for present work five models are studied 1) building without opening in slab 2) plan irregular building with 10% opening in slab 3) plan irregular building with 20% opening in slab 4) plan irregular building with 30% opening in slab 5) plan irregular building with 40% opening in slab. Output from software consisting of Pushover curve and hinge formation results of all five models which are presented. Plan irregularity find better structural system solution such as in 20% opening shows better base shear.
Keywords: Plan irregularity, Pushover analysis, Roof displacement, Base shear